Share:

Q ST/FAU 5026 over W BR PAPILLION CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+41.20517, -96.12495
41°12'19" N, 96°07'30" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:Q ST/FAU 5026 over W BR PAPILLION CREEK
Structure number:U182502820
Location:OMAHA Q @ 136TH
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:88.9 ft. [27.1 m]
Total length:227.0 ft. [69.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:63.7 ft. [19.4 m]
Skew angle:45°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1980
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:23,226 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:70.8 tons [64.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:41.9 tons [38.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:66.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
May 201666.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO23226
May 201464.0FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO23400
May 201276.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO23400
May 201075.6FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO29600
February 200875.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO29050
September 200664.9FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO29900
August 200465.4FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO27550
September 200266.2GoodGoodGoodGoodFO23650
September 200066.0GoodGoodGoodGoodFO24400
July 199866.0GoodGoodGoodGoodFO24400
June 199666.6GoodGoodGoodGoodFO21830
October 199468.3GoodGoodGoodGood-22300
May 199268.4GoodGoodGoodVery Good-22200
October 199078.8GoodGoodGoodVery Good-22200