132ND ST/FAU 5005 over STREAM


+41.19667, -96.12000
41°11'48" N, 96°07'12" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:132ND ST/FAU 5005 over STREAM
Structure number:U182503702
Location:OMAHA 132ND @ Z ST
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1983
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,318 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:81.4

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
December 2016Good7 out of 10731881.4
December 2014Good7 out of 10900079.9
October 2012Good7 out of 10900086.5
October 2010Good7 out of 101070083.3
January 2009Good7 out of 101070083.3
March 2007Good7 out of 101070096.0
January 2006Good8 out of 101670095.4
June 2004Good8 out of 101660095.4
December 2002Good8 out of 101510095.6
January 2000Good8 out of 101420095.7
February 1998Good8 out of 101420095.7
April 1996Good8 out of 10610096.4
February 1994Good8 out of 10600096.6
February 1992Good8 out of 101496075.8
July 1990Good8 out of 10860076.4