Share:

120TH ST/FAU 5009 over BIG PAPILLION CREEK TRIB

Map

Coordinates:
+41.28896, -96.10067
41°17'20" N, 96°06'02" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:120TH ST/FAU 5009 over BIG PAPILLION CREEK TRIB
Structure number:U182513910
Location:.25S 120TH & W MAPLE
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Total length:115.2 ft. [35.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:45.9 ft. [14.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:59.4 ft. [18.1 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1982
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:17,634 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:68.9 tons [62.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:37.0 tons [33.6 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:66.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
April 201666.0GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO17634
April 201466.0GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO21510
April 201277.1GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO21510
April 201074.7GoodGoodGoodGoodFO23900
April 200874.8FairSatisfactoryVery GoodGoodFO23100
June 200674.9FairSatisfactoryVery GoodGoodFO22500
June 200475.0FairSatisfactoryVery GoodGoodFO22200
October 200274.7GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO24000
August 200074.8GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO23100
September 199874.8GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO23100
July 199674.9GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO22450
September 199475.8GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO16600
December 199277.8GoodGoodVery GoodVery GoodFO16600