+41.27440, -96.08559
41°16'28" N, 96°05'08" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Structure number:U1825D1825
Location:111TH ST @ CHARLES ST
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Total length:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:23.6 ft. [7.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.6 ft. [7.8 m]
Owner:Private (other than railroad) [26]
Year built:1987
Year reconstructed:2010
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:200 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:12.0 tons [10.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:9.0 tons [8.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:48.9
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
June 201648.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-200
June 201448.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-200
June 201249.0GoodExcellentVery GoodVery Good-200
June 201149.0GoodExcellentVery GoodVery Good-200
March 201028.9PoorPoorPoorSatisfactorySD200
October 200838.0FairFairFairSatisfactoryFO200
May 200639.0FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO200
June 200449.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO200
May 200249.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO200
July 200049.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO200
June 199849.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO200
September 199649.0FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodFO200
October 199451.5FairGoodSatisfactoryGood-200
June 199251.5FairGoodSatisfactoryGood-200
July 199051.5GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-200