Share:

POTWIN ST over WEST PAPILLION CR TRIB

Map

Coordinates:
+41.20833, -96.12167
41°12'30" N, 96°07'18" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:POTWIN ST over WEST PAPILLION CR TRIB
Structure number:U1825G3515
Location:OMAHA POTWIN @ 134TH
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1988
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:200 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:88.6

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
March 2018Good8 out of 1020088.6
March 2016Good8 out of 1020088.6
March 2014Good7 out of 1020085.6
March 2012Good8 out of 1020085.4
March 2010Good7 out of 1020081.4
January 2008Good8 out of 1020081.4
February 2006Good8 out of 1020093.0
June 2004Good8 out of 1020093.0
February 2002Good8 out of 1020093.0
September 2000Good8 out of 1020093.0
February 1998Good8 out of 1020093.0
April 1996Good8 out of 1020093.0
October 1994Good8 out of 1020093.5
December 1992Good9 out of 1020093.5
March 1991Good9 out of 1020093.5