Share:

BEDFORD AVENUE over COLE CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+41.28833, -96.02500
41°17'18" N, 96°01'30" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:BEDFORD AVENUE over COLE CREEK
Structure number:U1825H1605
Location:OMAHA BEDFORD @ 72ND
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Total length:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Skew angle:20°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1972
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,200 [as of 2003]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:86.7

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
February 2017Good7 out of 10120086.7
February 2015Good7 out of 10120086.7
February 2013Good7 out of 10120087.6
February 2011Good7 out of 10120087.3
January 2009Good7 out of 10120087.3
June 2007Good7 out of 10120099.9
January 2006Good7 out of 10120099.9
January 2004Good7 out of 10120099.9
January 2002Good7 out of 10120099.9
February 2000Good7 out of 10120099.9
February 1998Good7 out of 10120099.9
April 1996Good7 out of 10120099.9
October 1994Good7 out of 10120099.9
December 1992Good7 out of 10120076.7
March 1991Good7 out of 10120085.5