Share:

GROVER ST/FAU 5036 over LITTLE PAPILLION CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+41.22698, -96.01253
41°13'37" N, 96°00'45" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:GROVER ST/FAU 5036 over LITTLE PAPILLION CREEK
Structure number:U1825H2405
Location:OMAHA GROVER @ 66TH
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:61.0 ft. [18.6 m]
Total length:154.9 ft. [47.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:39.4 ft. [12.0 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1983
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:14,106 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:82.8 tons [75.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:49.9 tons [45.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:69.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
April 201669.0GoodGoodGoodGoodFO14106
April 201469.0GoodGoodGoodGoodFO9400
April 201281.4GoodGoodGoodGoodFO9400
April 201080.6GoodGoodGoodGoodFO12000
December 200880.6FairSatisfactoryGoodGoodFO12000
July 200679.5FairSatisfactoryGoodGoodFO16100
May 200479.4FairSatisfactoryGoodGoodFO16400
December 200279.6FairSatisfactoryGoodGoodFO15800
October 200079.9GoodGoodGoodGoodFO14600
September 199879.9GoodGoodGoodGoodFO14600
July 199679.8GoodGoodGoodGoodFO15000
October 199483.1GoodVery GoodGoodGoodFO13200
April 199283.2GoodVery GoodVery GoodGoodFO12600
August 199083.2GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-12600