Share:

64TH AVENUE over STREAM

Map

Coordinates:
+41.23667, -96.01167
41°14'12" N, 96°00'42" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:64TH AVENUE over STREAM
Structure number:U1825I4705
Location:OMAHA 64TH @ CASTELAR
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Total length:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1978
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:200 [as of 2003]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:88.6

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
February 2017Good7 out of 1020088.6
February 2015Good7 out of 1020088.6
February 2013Good7 out of 1020087.8
February 2011Good7 out of 1020087.4
February 2009Good7 out of 1020088.4
May 2007Good7 out of 10200100.0
December 2005Good7 out of 10200100.0
February 2003Good7 out of 10200100.0
March 2001Good7 out of 10200100.0
November 2000Good7 out of 10200100.0
February 1999Good7 out of 10200100.0
April 1997Good7 out of 10200100.0
June 1995Good7 out of 10200100.0
April 1993Good8 out of 10200100.0
April 1991Good8 out of 10200100.0