+41.23522, -96.01193
41°14'07" N, 96°00'43" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:U1825I4705
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Total length:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1978
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:200 [as of 2003]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:24.0 tons [21.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:88.6

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
February 201788.6Good7 out of 10-200
February 201588.6Good7 out of 10-200
February 201387.8Good7 out of 10-200
February 201187.4Good7 out of 10-200
February 200988.4Good7 out of 10-200
May 2007100.0Good7 out of 10-200
December 2005100.0Good7 out of 10-200
February 2003100.0Good7 out of 10-200
March 2001100.0Good7 out of 10-200
November 2000100.0Good7 out of 10-200
February 1999100.0Good7 out of 10-200
April 1997100.0Good7 out of 10-200
June 1995100.0Good7 out of 10-200
April 1993100.0Good8 out of 10-200
April 1991100.0Good8 out of 10-200