50TH ST. over MILL CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+41.34369, -95.9895641°20'37" N, 95°59'22" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
Name: | 50TH ST. over MILL CREEK |
Structure number: | U1825J4905 |
Location: | .2S N36 & 50TH ST. |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
Length of largest span: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
Total length: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1965 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2016
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 200 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Culvert condition: | Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Operating rating: | 36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons] |
Inventory rating: | 24.0 tons [21.8 metric tons] |
Sufficiency rating: | 85.6 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Suff. Rating | Condition | Culvert Condition | SD/FO | ADT |
---|
March 2016 | 85.6 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | - | 200 |
March 2014 | 85.6 | Good | 7 out of 10 | - | 200 |
March 2012 | 88.4 | Good | 7 out of 10 | - | 200 |
March 2010 | 77.4 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | - | 200 |
January 2008 | 77.4 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | - | 200 |
January 2006 | 100.0 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | - | 200 |
December 2003 | 100.0 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | - | 200 |
January 2002 | 100.0 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | - | 200 |
February 2000 | 100.0 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | - | 200 |
April 1998 | 100.0 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | - | 200 |
July 1996 | 100.0 | Good | 7 out of 10 | - | 200 |