WEST BATH ROAD over AMMONOOSUC R,NHRR(ABD)
Map
Coordinates:
+44.16685, -71.9672244°10'01" N, 71°58'02" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | WEST BATH ROAD over AMMONOOSUC R,NHRR(ABD) |
Structure number: | 001801370009500 |
Location: | 0.1 MI NH 10 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 86.9 ft. [26.5 m] |
Total length: | 375.0 ft. [114.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 20.3 ft. [6.2 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 8.2 ft. [2.5 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1832 |
Year reconstructed: | 2014 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
Number of main spans: | 7 |
Main spans material: | Wood or timber [7] |
Main spans design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 92 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Sufficiency rating: | 27.0 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $3,142,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Fair | Very Good | Good | Fair | 92 | 27.0 |
December 2017 | Fair | Excellent | Good | Fair | 310 | 23.1 |
November 2016 | Fair | Excellent | Good | Fair | 310 | 23.1 |
October 2015 | Fair | Excellent | Good | Fair | 310 | 23.1 |
September 2014 | Fair | Excellent | Good | Fair | 380 | 22.7 |
November 2013 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Critical | 380 | 0.0 |
February 2013 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Critical | 380 | 0.0 |
October 2011 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Critical | 460 | 0.0 |
October 2010 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Serious | 500 | 0.0 |
February 2010 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Serious | 500 | 0.0 |
September 2008 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Serious | 500 | 0.0 |
November 2007 | Poor | Poor | Serious | Serious | 500 | 0.0 |
December 2006 | Poor | Poor | Serious | Serious | 350 | 0.0 |
November 2004 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Serious | 350 | 0.0 |
August 2003 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Serious | 350 | 0.0 |
December 2002 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Serious | 350 | 0.0 |
December 2001 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Serious | 350 | 0.0 |
October 2000 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Serious | 350 | 0.0 |
October 1998 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 350 | 0.0 |
December 1997 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 350 | 0.0 |
October 1996 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 350 | 0.0 |
September 1995 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 350 | 0.0 |
December 1994 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 350 | 0.0 |
October 1993 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 350 | 0.0 |
September 1991 | Poor | Good | Fair | Poor | 550 | 0.0 |