Share:

SR757 MULLER LN over E CHNL CARSON RVR

Douglas County, Nevada

Map

Coordinates:
+38.97088, -119.81328
38°58'15" N, 119°48'48" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	SR757 MULLER LN over E CHNL CARSON RVR
Structure number:	B 476
Location:	SOUTHWEST OF GENOA
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Minor Collector (Rural) `[08]`
Length of largest span:	29.9 ft. `[9.1 m]`
Total length:	75.5 ft. `[23.0 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	24.0 ft. `[7.3 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	27.9 ft. `[8.5 m]`
Skew angle:	37°
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1947
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	M 13.5 / H 15 `[2]`
Number of main spans:	4
Main spans material:	Concrete continuous `[2]`
Main spans design:	Slab `[01]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Latest Available Inspection: May 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Good
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	1,500 `[as of 2014]`
Truck traffic:	5% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. `[7]`
Pier/abutment protection:	Navigation protection not required `[1]`
Scour condition:	Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. `[7]`
Sufficiency rating:	64.5
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`
Estimated cost of work:	$376,000

Previous Inspections

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
May 2017	Good	Good	Good	Good	1500	64.5
May 2015	Good	Good	Good	Good	1500	64.5
May 2013	Good	Good	Good	Good	1500	64.5
May 2011	Good	Good	Good	Good	1500	63.7
May 2009	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	1500	78.3
May 2007	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	1500	78.3
September 2006	Good	Good	Good	Good	1500	78.3
May 2003	Good	Good	Good	Good	1400	78.4
May 2001	Good	Good	Good	Good	1400	79.4
May 1999	Good	Good	Good	Good	1250	79.6
May 1997	Good	Good	Good	Good	1070	79.8
April 1995	Good	Good	Good	Good	935	78.9
May 1993	Good	Good	Good	Good	935	78.9
May 1991	Good	Good	Good	Good	795	79.1

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Column	each	10	10	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall	linear ft.	35	0	35	0	0
Other Material Pier Wall	linear ft.	70	70	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing	linear ft.	95	95	0	0	0
Timber Pile	each	32	32	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap	linear ft.	70	70	0	0	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	131	0	31	100	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	131	0	0	0	131
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail	linear ft.	20	15	4	1	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Slab	sq. ft.	2,106	1,776	330	0	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	1,804	1,351	453	0	0

© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1374389