Share: 
ROBINDALE RD. over DUCK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+36.04976, -115.14815
36°02'59" N, 115°08'53" W
+36.04976, -115.14815
36°02'59" N, 115°08'53" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | ROBINDALE RD. over DUCK CREEK |
| Structure number: | B2432 |
| Location: | SOUTH EAST LAS VEGAS |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
| Total length: | 31.5 ft. [9.6 m] |
| Skew angle: | 45° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1992 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 550 [as of 2014] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Culvert condition: | Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 96.9 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 2017 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 550 | 96.9 |
| November 2013 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 550 | 96.9 |
| November 2011 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 550 | 96.9 |
| November 2009 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 550 | 96.9 |
| November 2007 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 550 | 96.9 |
| January 2006 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 500 | 96.9 |
| January 2004 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 500 | 96.9 |
| January 2002 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 500 | 96.9 |
| July 1999 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 500 | 96.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culvert | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 394 | 348 | 44 | 2 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1375045
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1375045