Share:

I 80 over SR667 EL RANCHO

Map

Coordinates:
+39.53444, -119.77583
39°32'04" N, 119°46'33" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:I 80 over SR667 EL RANCHO
Structure number:H1003
Location:SPARKS
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:107.9 ft. [32.9 m]
Total length:217.9 ft. [66.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:129.3 ft. [39.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:138.1 ft. [42.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:33°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1969
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Epoxy Overlay [5]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:114,000 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:67.4 tons [61.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:40.5 tons [36.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:83.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$3,164,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
June 201683.0FairSatisfactoryGoodGood-114000
June 201483.0FairSatisfactoryGoodGood-102000
June 201283.3FairSatisfactoryGoodGood-88000
June 201083.0FairSatisfactoryGoodGood-88000
June 200883.0FairSatisfactoryGoodGood-88000
June 200683.0FairSatisfactoryGoodGood-96625
June 200481.0FairSatisfactoryGoodGoodFO100500
May 200278.0FairFairGoodSatisfactoryFO96625
May 200079.0FairFairGoodSatisfactoryFO96625
June 199879.0FairFairGoodSatisfactoryFO96625
June 199680.0FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO91650
June 199481.0GoodGoodVery GoodVery GoodFO84075
April 199281.0GoodGoodVery GoodVery GoodFO80650
June 199081.0GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO69965