Share:

RTE 32 over MOHAWK RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+42.77941, -73.69657
42°46'46" N, 73°41'48" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RTE 32 over MOHAWK RIVER
Structure number:000000001022500
Location:0.4 MI N JCT RTS 32 & 470
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:107.9 ft. [32.9 m]
Total length:702.1 ft. [214.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:54.1 ft. [16.5 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1933
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:7
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:15,560 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4]
Sufficiency rating:52.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$26,625,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
June 2016Fair-FairSatisfactory1556052.7
May 2014Fair-FairSatisfactory1662349.5
June 2012Fair-FairFair1660049.5
June 2010FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory1772749.5
July 2008FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory1772749.5
May 2006FairGoodFairSatisfactory1859049.5
June 2004FairVery GoodFairSatisfactory1859048.5
May 2002FairFairFairSatisfactory1749148.6
June 2000FairFairFairSatisfactory1749148.6
May 1998FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory1749158.6
August 1996Poor-Poor-1784033.5
June 1994Poor-Poor-1801249.5
July 1992Poor-Poor-1801249.5
June 1990Poor-PoorPoor1825832.8

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Reinforced Concrete Archlinear ft.61604092070
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Pier Walllinear ft.520051910
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.130013000
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footinglinear ft.7800756240
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Raillinear ft.1,36401,1212430