RTE 987G over RTE 44
Map
Coordinates:
+41.77634, -73.7684241°46'35" N, 73°46'06" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | RTE 987G over RTE 44 |
Structure number: | 000000001025579 |
Location: | JCT TSP & RTE 44 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 61.7 ft. [18.8 m] |
Total length: | 63.0 ft. [19.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 55.1 ft. [16.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 63.3 ft. [19.3 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 35° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1947 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Frame [07] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 16,388 [as of 2011] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 67.3 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $4,830,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 16388 | 67.3 |
December 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 13888 | 69.0 |
December 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 14560 | 69.0 |
December 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 13900 | 80.0 |
December 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8344 | 80.0 |
December 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8344 | 80.0 |
December 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8344 | 80.0 |
December 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8344 | 80.0 |
December 2002 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 8104 | 68.0 |
November 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8104 | 80.0 |
October 1998 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 7348 | 68.0 |
September 1996 | Poor | - | Poor | Fair | 7312 | 50.8 |
November 1994 | Poor | - | Poor | Satisfactory | 8553 | 45.8 |
October 1992 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 6539 | 66.0 |
March 1992 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 7663 | 65.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 156 | 0 | 106 | 50 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 242 | 80 | 162 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 1,381 | 0 | 1,367 | 0 | 14 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 3,988 | 0 | 3,946 | 42 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 3,150 | 0 | 3,150 | 0 | 0 |