RTE 149 over Indian River
Map
Coordinates:
+43.37385, -73.2825943°22'26" N, 73°16'57" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | RTE 149 over Indian River |
Structure number: | 000000001038500 |
Location: | 0.3 MI N Jct Rte 149 & 28 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 39.0 ft. [11.9 m] |
Total length: | 42.0 ft. [12.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 32.8 ft. [10.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 12° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 2003 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Frame [07] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 3,245 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 96.4 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $775,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2017 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 3245 | 96.4 |
May 2015 | Good | - | Very Good | Very Good | 2978 | 96.4 |
May 2013 | Good | - | Excellent | Excellent | 2978 | 96.4 |
May 2011 | Good | - | Excellent | Excellent | 2950 | 96.4 |
May 2009 | Good | - | Excellent | Excellent | 2878 | 96.5 |
May 2007 | Good | - | Excellent | Excellent | 2878 | 37.1 |
June 2005 | Good | - | Excellent | Excellent | 3005 | 37.0 |
November 2003 | Good | - | Excellent | Excellent | 3005 | 80.3 |
September 2001 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 5035 | 66.5 |
November 1999 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 3921 | 66.8 |
May 1997 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 2894 | 67.1 |
June 1995 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Poor | 2894 | 49.5 |
May 1993 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Poor | 5351 | 48.2 |
May 1991 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Poor | 2762 | 49.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 72 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 87 | 87 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 84 | 84 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 500 | 500 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 1,525 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 1,400 | 1,400 | 0 | 0 | 0 |