RTE 168 over FULMER CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+42.96744, -74.9297642°58'03" N, 74°55'47" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | RTE 168 over FULMER CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000001051340 |
Location: | 4.7M SE JCT RTS 28&168 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 59.7 ft. [18.2 m] |
Total length: | 65.9 ft. [20.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 33.1 ft. [10.1 m] |
Skew angle: | 45° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1987 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 458 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 97.5 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $879,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2017 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 458 | 97.5 |
May 2015 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 461 | 92.6 |
April 2013 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 456 | 91.3 |
April 2011 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 440 | 91.3 |
April 2009 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Excellent | 568 | 90.1 |
March 2009 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Excellent | 568 | 90.1 |
April 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Excellent | 572 | 91.1 |
April 2005 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Excellent | 569 | 90.1 |
April 2003 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Excellent | 605 | 91.1 |
May 2001 | Good | Excellent | Very Good | Excellent | 593 | 97.4 |
April 1999 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 565 | 97.4 |
April 1997 | Good | - | Very Good | Good | 559 | 98.4 |
April 1995 | Fair | - | Very Good | Satisfactory | 592 | 98.4 |
May 1993 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Fair | 592 | 87.3 |
April 1991 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Fair | 471 | 87.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Closed Web/Box Girder | linear ft. | 502 | 466 | 35 | 1 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 2,142 | 2,089 | 24 | 29 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 1,987 | 1,987 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 112 | 107 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 16 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 132 | 132 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 462 | 0 | 370 | 92 | 0 |