FRNCIS LEWIS BLVD over RTE I495, 495I 495IX5M13


+40.74328, -73.77564
40°44'36" N, 73°46'32" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:FRNCIS LEWIS BLVD over RTE I495, 495I 495IX5M13
Structure number:000000001055209
Location:I495 AT EXIT 26
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:65.9 ft. [20.1 m]
Total length:182.8 ft. [55.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:76.1 ft. [23.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:102.7 ft. [31.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Year reconstructed:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10,073 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:59.8 tons [54.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:91.5
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$10,582,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
October 201691.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO10073
November 201473.6FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO10073
December 201272.6FairFairSatisfactoryGoodFO10100
November 201072.6FairFairSatisfactoryGoodFO10073
December 200871.9FairFairSatisfactoryGoodFO19687
November 200690.0FairFairSatisfactoryGoodFO19074
September 200492.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-19074
September 200292.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-19074
May 200093.1FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO18627
August 199893.1GoodGoodGoodVery GoodFO18627
September 199679.9FairFairFairFairFO17599
August 199562.8PoorPoorFairPoorSD17599
April 199445.2PoorPoorFairSeriousSD14410
May 199345.2PoorPoorFairSeriousSD14410
June 199245.2PoorPoorFairSeriousSD14410
August 199145.2PoorPoorFairSeriousSD14410