Share:

RTE I495 over RTE I295, RTE I295

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.74421, -73.77165
40°44'39" N, 73°46'18" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I495 over RTE I295, RTE I295
Structure number:000000001055230
Location:JCT I495+I78
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:68.9 ft. [21.0 m]
Total length:126.0 ft. [38.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Year reconstructed:1990
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,652 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:101.8 tons [92.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:60.8 tons [55.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:92.8
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$294,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
January 201692.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO3652
February 201491.3GoodGoodGoodGoodFO76120
March 201291.3GoodGoodGoodGoodFO76120
March 201089.3GoodGoodGoodGoodFO76120
March 200887.2GoodGoodGoodGoodFO118573
August 200671.1GoodGoodGoodGoodFO76120
July 200472.1GoodGoodGoodGoodFO76120
August 200272.1GoodGoodGoodGoodFO76120
June 200072.1GoodGoodGoodGoodFO76120
September 199872.1GoodVery GoodVery GoodGoodFO76120
November 199654.1FairVery GoodSatisfactoryFairFO76120
December 199436.1PoorVery GoodSatisfactoryPoorSD76120
December 199236.1PoorVery GoodSatisfactoryPoorSD76120
December 199036.1PoorVery GoodSatisfactoryPoorSD76120