RTE I495 over RTE I295, RTE I295, RTE


+40.74271, -73.77074
40°44'34" N, 73°46'15" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE I495 over RTE I295, RTE I295, RTE
Structure number:000000001055289
Location:JCT I495+I295
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:56.8 ft. [17.3 m]
Total length:172.9 ft. [52.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:56.1 ft. [17.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:85.3 ft. [26.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Year reconstructed:2003
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:5,747 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:82.8 tons [75.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:49.9 tons [45.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:93.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$8,331,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
June 201593.7GoodVery GoodExcellentGoodFO5747
June 201393.7GoodVery GoodExcellentGoodFO5747
July 201190.3GoodVery GoodExcellentVery Good-76120
July 200990.3GoodVery GoodExcellentVery Good-76120
July 200790.3GoodVery GoodExcellentVery Good-76120
July 200590.3GoodExcellentVery GoodVery GoodFO76120
September 200390.3GoodExcellentVery GoodVery GoodFO76120
March 200359.2PoorFairSatisfactoryPoorSD76120
February 200059.2PoorFairSatisfactoryPoorSD76120
April 199876.5FairFairSatisfactoryFairFO76120
April 199650.9PoorPoorFairPoorSD76120
May 199452.8PoorPoorFairPoorSD76120
August 199255.1PoorFairFairPoorSD76120
October 199052.8PoorPoorFairPoorSD76120