Share:

SPRINGFIELD BLVD over RTE I495, RTE I495

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.74936, -73.75687
40°44'58" N, 73°45'25" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:SPRINGFIELD BLVD over RTE I495, RTE I495
Structure number:000000001055320
Location:.9 MI NE I78+I495
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:52.8 ft. [16.1 m]
Total length:109.9 ft. [33.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:81.4 ft. [24.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1959
Year reconstructed:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:8,349 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:72.8 tons [66.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:42.9 tons [39.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:73.5
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$2,406,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
June 201673.5FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO8349
July 201562.3FairFairFairSatisfactoryFO8349
July 201461.6FairFairFairSatisfactoryFO17077
August 201362.7FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO17077
August 201262.7FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO17077
August 201162.7FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO17077
August 201063.2FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO10178
August 200963.2FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO10178
August 200874.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO10178
May 200774.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO15674
July 200673.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO17077
July 200474.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO17077
August 200274.9FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO17077
June 200073.9FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO16498
July 199873.9FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO16498
October 199644.5PoorPoorFairPoorSD9967
August 199446.7PoorPoorFairPoorSD12280
July 199246.7PoorPoorPoorPoorSD12280
October 199148.8PoorFairFairPoorSD12280