Share:

EAST HAMPTON BLVD over RTE I495, RTE I495

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.75201, -73.74684
40°45'07" N, 73°44'49" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:EAST HAMPTON BLVD over RTE I495, RTE I495
Structure number:000000001055340
Location:.2 MI SW JCT CI PKWY&I495
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:65.9 ft. [20.1 m]
Total length:131.9 ft. [40.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:80.7 ft. [24.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2002
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:15,247 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:68.9 tons [62.6 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:76.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$5,995,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
July 201576.0GoodGoodVery GoodVery GoodFO15247
July 201376.4GoodGoodVery GoodVery GoodFO9170
August 201176.4GoodVery GoodExcellentExcellentFO9170
August 200976.4GoodVery GoodExcellentExcellent-9170
August 200776.4GoodVery GoodExcellentExcellent-9170
September 200576.4GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good-9170
October 200376.4GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-9170
March 200369.3FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory-9170
June 200069.3FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO9315
August 199870.3FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO9315
November 199638.1PoorPoorPoorPoorSD8411
December 199443.5PoorPoorPoorPoorSD5200
November 199243.5PoorPoorPoorPoorSD5200
December 199025.0PoorPoorPoorSeriousSD5200