Share:

RTE I678 over FLUSHING CREEK, MEADOW L

Map

Coordinates:
+40.76252, -73.83990
40°45'45" N, 73°50'24" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RTE I678 over FLUSHING CREEK, MEADOW L
Structure number:000000001055789
Location:JCT I495+RTE 678
Purpose:Carries highway over highway, waterway, and railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:180.1 ft. [54.9 m]
Total length:9848.6 ft. [3001.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:51.8 ft. [15.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:94.2 ft. [28.7 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:129
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:139,632 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:30.3
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$792,800,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
October 2016PoorFairPoorPoor13963230.3
November 2014PoorFairPoorPoor12728928.9
November 2012PoorFairPoorPoor12728928.9
October 2010PoorFairPoorPoor12467528.9
October 2008PoorFairPoorPoor12173338.0
November 2006PoorFairPoorPoor12063244.0
December 2005PoorFairPoorPoor13785244.0
December 2004PoorFairPoorPoor13785244.0
December 2002FairFairFairFair8376443.0
August 2000FairFairFairSatisfactory8376443.0
November 1998FairFairFairSatisfactory8376443.0
November 1996PoorPoorSeriousPoor7919117.9
August 1994PoorPoorSeriousSerious6885719.2
November 1993PoorPoorPoorSerious12478319.2
December 1992PoorPoorSeriousSerious8529019.2
November 1991PoorSeriousSeriousSerious8529029.2

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beamlinear ft.86291506
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beamlinear ft.103001030
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Columneach40040
Steel Pier Caplinear ft.20200
Reinforced Concrete Pier Caplinear ft.824008240
Bearings
Movable Bearingeach10001