+40.76693, -73.88765
40°46'01" N, 73°53'16" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:DITMARS BLVD over RTE 907M, RTE 907M
Structure number:000000001055859
Location:.9 MI E I278 + GCP
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:77.8 ft. [23.7 m]
Total length:152.9 ft. [46.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:71.9 ft. [21.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:100.4 ft. [30.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:12,349 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:93.8 tons [85.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:55.9 tons [50.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:91.4
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$1,583,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
May 201691.4GoodGoodGoodGoodFO12349
May 201490.8GoodGoodGoodGoodFO23516
May 201290.8GoodGoodGoodGoodFO23516
May 201091.6GoodGoodGoodGoodFO8724
May 200891.6GoodGoodGoodGoodFO8724
April 200690.8GoodGoodGoodGoodFO23516
March 200490.8GoodGoodGoodGoodFO23516
April 200293.8GoodGoodGoodGoodFO23516
February 200082.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFairFO23516
March 199882.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFairFO23516
April 199664.4PoorFairFairPoorSD17000
March 199464.9PoorFairFairPoorSD17000
February 199264.9PoorFairFairPoorSD17000
January 199062.8PoorPoorPoorPoorSD17000