94TH STREET over RTE 907M, RTE 907M


+40.77143, -73.87612
40°46'17" N, 73°52'34" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:94TH STREET over RTE 907M, RTE 907M
Structure number:000000001055869
Location:1.6 MI E I278+GCP
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:116.1 ft. [35.4 m]
Total length:199.2 ft. [60.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:64.0 ft. [19.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:86.6 ft. [26.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Year reconstructed:2014
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:31,832 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:107.8 tons [98.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:63.9 tons [58.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:92.4
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$9,672,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
March 201692.4GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good-31832
February 201492.4GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good-32638
March 201292.4GoodExcellentExcellentVery GoodFO32638
March 201091.4FairFairGoodGoodFO31620
March 200891.4FairFairGoodGoodFO31620
February 200692.4GoodGoodGoodGoodFO32638
February 200493.4GoodGoodGoodGoodFO32638
March 200294.4GoodGoodGoodGoodFO32638
January 200093.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO33553
January 199882.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFairFO33553
January 199680.8FairFairFairFairFO27794
January 199466.7PoorFairFairPoorSD11000
January 199266.7PoorFairFairPoorSD11000
February 199067.7PoorSatisfactoryFairPoorSD11000