92 STREET over RTE I278, RTE I278


+40.61631, -74.02627
40°36'59" N, 74°01'35" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:92 STREET over RTE I278, RTE I278
Structure number:000000001065220
Location:.7MI NE JCT I278+BELT PKY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:66.9 ft. [20.4 m]
Total length:258.9 ft. [78.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:91.9 ft. [28.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:14,249 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:11% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:77.9 tons [70.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:46.9 tons [42.6 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:81.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$6,228,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
July 201681.2FairSatisfactoryFairFairFO14249
August 201480.9FairSatisfactoryFairFairFO18665
July 201261.5FairSatisfactoryFairFairFO18665
July 201072.8FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO18665
August 200872.9FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO17434
May 200672.8FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO18665
April 200473.8GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO18665
May 200273.8GoodVery GoodVery GoodGoodFO18665
January 200066.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodGoodFO18665
January 199855.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFairFO17950
February 199642.4PoorPoorPoorPoorSD18661
February 199442.6PoorPoorPoorPoorSD22264
February 199242.6PoorPoorPoorPoorSD22264
May 199042.6PoorPoorPoorPoorSD22264