Share:

FT HAMILTON PKWY over RTE I278, RTE I278, RTE

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.62230, -74.02096
40°37'20" N, 74°01'15" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:FT HAMILTON PKWY over RTE I278, RTE I278, RTE
Structure number:000000001065250
Location:1.2MI NE JCT I278+BELT PY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:108.9 ft. [33.2 m]
Total length:439.0 ft. [133.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:53.5 ft. [16.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:45°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,603 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:49.9 tons [45.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:29.9 tons [27.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:59.4
Recommended work:Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36]
Estimated cost of work:$13,019,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
February 201659.4FairFairSatisfactoryFairFO9603
February 201459.3FairFairSatisfactoryFairFO9624
January 201277.3FairFairSatisfactoryFairFO10774
January 201079.4FairFairSatisfactoryFairFO10774
February 200890.5FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO10774
January 200690.5FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO10774
January 200488.4FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO10774
February 200272.4FairFairSatisfactoryGoodFO10774
March 200070.4FairFairGoodGoodFO10774
June 199857.6PoorPoorFairFairSD5925
February 199658.9PoorPoorFairFairSD5925
February 199443.9PoorPoorFairPoorSD9700
March 199240.5PoorPoorFairPoorSD9700
August 199040.5PoorPoorFairPoorSD9700