Share:

RTE I278 over NAVY STREET

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.69650, -73.98042
40°41'47" N, 73°58'50" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I278 over NAVY STREET
Structure number:00000000106539A
Location:3.9 MI SW JCT I278 & I495
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:63.0 ft. [19.2 m]
Total length:257.9 ft. [78.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.6 ft. [7.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.6 ft. [8.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Year reconstructed:2010
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:122,232 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Inventory rating:80.9 tons [73.5 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:94.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$3,999,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
January 201694.0GoodExcellentVery GoodVery Good-122232
January 201494.0GoodExcellentVery GoodVery Good-10600
February 201287.0GoodExcellentExcellentGoodFO10600
February 201087.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodGoodFO10600
February 200887.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodGoodFO10600
January 200687.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO10600
February 200487.0FairSatisfactoryVery GoodGoodFO10600
March 200287.0FairSatisfactoryVery GoodGoodFO10600
January 200089.0FairSatisfactoryVery GoodGoodFO10600
January 199877.0FairFairFairSatisfactoryFO10600
January 199659.0PoorPoorPoorPoorSD10600
February 199475.0PoorPoorFairFairSD10600
April 199275.0PoorPoorFairFairSD10600
November 199059.0PoorPoorFairPoorSD10600