JESUP AVENUE over RTE I95, RTE 95I
Map
Coordinates:
+40.84502, -73.9184640°50'42" N, 73°55'06" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
Name: | JESUP AVENUE over RTE I95, RTE 95I |
Structure number: | 000000001066240 |
Location: | .4 MI E I87+I95 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway |
Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
Length of largest span: | 119.8 ft. [36.5 m] |
Total length: | 203.1 ft. [61.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 15.1 ft. [4.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 71.9 ft. [21.9 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 46.9 ft. [14.3 m] |
Skew angle: | 12° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1964 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2016
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Operating rating: | 75.8 tons [68.9 metric tons] |
Inventory rating: | 45.9 tons [41.7 metric tons] |
Sufficiency rating: | 74.5 |
Recommended work: | Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. [36] |
Estimated cost of work: | $615,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Suff. Rating | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | SD/FO | ADT |
---|
July 2016 | 74.5 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | SD | - |
July 2014 | 71.8 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | SD | 2810 |
August 2012 | 71.8 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | SD | 2810 |
September 2010 | 71.8 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | SD | 2810 |
September 2008 | 71.8 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | SD | 2810 |
October 2006 | 60.8 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | SD | 2810 |
November 2004 | 60.8 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | SD | 2810 |
October 2002 | 60.8 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | SD | 2810 |
November 2000 | 62.0 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | SD | 2810 |
October 1998 | 75.1 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | FO | 2810 |
October 1997 | 62.0 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | SD | 2810 |
October 1996 | 47.6 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | SD | 2810 |
September 1995 | 54.3 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | SD | 1300 |
December 1994 | 54.3 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | SD | 1300 |
November 1992 | 54.3 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | SD | 1300 |
November 1990 | 54.3 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | SD | 1300 |