RTE I278 over RTE I278, RTE I278, RTE


+40.82910, -73.84003
40°49'45" N, 73°50'24" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE I278 over RTE I278, RTE I278, RTE
Structure number:00000000106652A
Location:JCT I95 & I878 & I78
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:143.7 ft. [43.8 m]
Total length:1890.8 ft. [576.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.8 ft. [10.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1971
Year reconstructed:2001
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:17
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:86,813 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:95.4 tons [86.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:90.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$8,653,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
July 201590.0GoodGoodGoodGoodFO86813
July 201389.9GoodGoodGoodGoodFO16839
June 201189.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodGoodFO16839
June 200989.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-16839
June 200789.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-16839
June 200589.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-16839
May 200388.9GoodExcellentGoodGood-16839
July 200173.0GoodExcellentGoodGoodFO84131
March 200172.0FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO84131
May 199872.0FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO84131
December 199762.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFairFO84131
October 199626.6PoorFairSeriousPoorSD84131
September 199445.6PoorFairFairPoorSD84131
September 199245.6PoorFairFairPoorSD84131
October 199043.6PoorPoorPoorPoorSD84131