Share:

GUN HILL ROAD over RTE 907H, RTE 907H

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.87818, -73.86987
40°52'41" N, 73°52'12" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:GUN HILL ROAD over RTE 907H, RTE 907H
Structure number:000000001067130
Location:3.0 MI N I95+BX RIVER PKY
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:40.7 ft. [12.4 m]
Total length:97.8 ft. [29.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:95.5 ft. [29.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1951
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:20,448 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:64.8 tons [58.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:24.5 tons [22.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:80.4
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$22,986,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
January 201680.4Fair-SatisfactoryGoodFO20448
February 201470.3Fair-SatisfactoryGoodFO20448
February 201270.3Fair-SatisfactoryGoodFO20400
February 201068.8Fair-SatisfactoryGoodFO43462
February 200868.8Fair-SatisfactoryGoodFO43462
January 200668.8Fair-SatisfactoryGoodFO43462
February 200468.8Fair-SatisfactorySatisfactoryFO43462
January 200268.3Fair-SatisfactorySatisfactoryFO35955
January 200043.3PoorFairSatisfactoryPoorSD35955
April 199868.3FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO35955
February 199639.3Poor-FairPoorSD38706
March 199447.0Poor-FairPoorSD13500
February 199249.1Poor-PoorPoorSD13500
February 199061.4Poor-FairPoorSD13500