EAST 238TH STREET over RTE 907H, BRONX RIVER, M
Map
Coordinates:
+40.90086, -73.8609440°54'03" N, 73°51'39" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | EAST 238TH STREET over RTE 907H, BRONX RIVER, M |
Structure number: | 000000001067150 |
Location: | 4.6 MILES N JCT I95 & BRP |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway, waterway, and railroad |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
Length of largest span: | 76.8 ft. [23.4 m] |
Total length: | 775.0 ft. [236.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 75.1 ft. [22.9 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1930 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Number of main spans: | 10 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 11,433 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 69.8 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $104,291,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2017 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 11433 | 69.8 |
September 2015 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 11913 | 69.8 |
October 2013 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 11913 | 69.8 |
October 2011 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 11900 | 69.8 |
December 2009 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 13343 | 69.7 |
November 2007 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 12614 | 70.7 |
July 2005 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 12650 | 70.7 |
July 2003 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 12650 | 70.7 |
November 2001 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 12650 | 69.2 |
November 1999 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 12650 | 68.2 |
October 1997 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 12650 | 50.8 |
September 1995 | Poor | - | Poor | Poor | 12650 | 32.1 |
September 1993 | Poor | - | Fair | Poor | 12650 | 37.0 |
September 1991 | Poor | - | Poor | Poor | 12650 | 39.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Arch | linear ft. | 680 | 125 | 447 | 108 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 553 | 0 | 515 | 38 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 153 | 0 | 153 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 1,360 | 0 | 1,351 | 9 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 20,690 | 0 | 20,690 | 0 | 0 |