Share:

BLOOMINGDALE ROAD over RTE 909C, RTE 909C

Map

Coordinates:
+40.52839, -74.21673
40°31'42" N, 74°13'00" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:BLOOMINGDALE ROAD over RTE 909C, RTE 909C
Structure number:000000001067500
Location:.7 MI E JCT440+W SHORE EX
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:92.9 ft. [28.3 m]
Total length:188.0 ft. [57.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:74.2 ft. [22.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1972
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,700 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Sufficiency rating:74.6
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$1,398,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
January 2016GoodVery GoodExcellentGood670074.6
January 2014GoodVery GoodExcellentGood1001074.4
January 2012GoodVery GoodExcellentGood1001093.5
January 2010GoodVery GoodExcellentGood1001093.5
January 2008GoodVery GoodExcellentGood1158993.4
January 2006GoodVery GoodExcellentGood1001093.5
January 2004GoodVery GoodExcellentGood1001094.5
February 2002GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good1001094.5
January 2000FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory1001094.5
February 1998FairGoodGoodSatisfactory774594.6
April 1996FairFairFairFair790062.7
April 1994FairFairFairFair790063.0
March 1992FairFairFairFair790063.0
February 1990FairFairSatisfactoryFair790063.0