RTE 9 over CHESTER CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+43.65573, -73.8012743°39'21" N, 73°48'05" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | RTE 9 over CHESTER CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000001069020 |
Location: | JCT RTE 8 & RTE 9 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 14.8 ft. [4.5 m] |
Total length: | 33.1 ft. [10.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 39.0 ft. [11.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 42.7 ft. [13.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 9° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1967 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Wearing surface: | Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2016
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,539 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Culvert condition: | Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 96.9 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $404,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2016 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1539 | 96.9 |
July 2014 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1701 | 97.9 |
August 2012 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1700 | 97.9 |
August 2010 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1701 | 97.9 |
July 2008 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 2450 | 95.9 |
June 2006 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2478 | 95.9 |
June 2004 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2541 | 96.9 |
September 2002 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2541 | 97.9 |
November 2000 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2310 | 95.9 |
June 1998 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 2310 | 95.9 |
August 1996 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 2113 | 95.8 |
July 1994 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 2113 | 95.8 |
October 1992 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 2874 | 95.8 |
July 1990 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 2427 | 82.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Culvert |
Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 86 | 0 | 86 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 70 | 0 | 70 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 210 | 0 | 210 | 0 | 0 |