Share:

RTE 9 over CHESTER CREEK

Warren County, New York

Map

Coordinates:
+43.65573, -73.80127
43°39'21" N, 73°48'05" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RTE 9 over CHESTER CREEK
Structure number:000000001069020
Location:JCT RTE 8 & RTE 9
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Total length:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:39.0 ft. [11.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:42.7 ft. [13.0 m]
Skew angle:9°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1967
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,539 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:96.9
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$404,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
July 2016Fair6 out of 10153996.9
July 2014Fair6 out of 10170197.9
August 2012Fair6 out of 10170097.9
August 2010Fair6 out of 10170197.9
July 2008Fair6 out of 10245095.9
June 2006Good7 out of 10247895.9
June 2004Good7 out of 10254196.9
September 2002Good7 out of 10254197.9
November 2000Good7 out of 10231095.9
June 1998Good8 out of 10231095.9
August 1996Fair6 out of 10211395.8
July 1994Fair6 out of 10211395.8
October 1992Fair6 out of 10287495.8
July 1990Fair5 out of 10242782.9

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Culvert
Reinforced Concrete Culvertlinear ft.8608600
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Raillinear ft.7007000
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.210021000