RTE 440 over RTE 440


+40.62097, -74.17527
40°37'15" N, 74°10'31" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 440 over RTE 440
Structure number:000000001075200
Location:JCT I278+W SHORE EXPY
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:111.9 ft. [34.1 m]
Total length:117.8 ft. [35.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:48°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1973
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:33,623 [as of 1994]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:109.8 tons [99.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:65.9 tons [59.9 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:85.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$2,391,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
June 201685.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO33623
July 201485.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO33623
June 201285.0GoodExcellentVery GoodExcellentFO33623
July 201085.0GoodExcellentVery GoodExcellentFO33623
August 200885.0GoodExcellentVery GoodExcellentFO33623
May 200685.0GoodExcellentVery GoodExcellentFO33623
June 200485.0GoodExcellentVery GoodExcellentFO33623
May 200285.0GoodExcellentVery GoodExcellentFO33623
February 200083.0GoodExcellentVery GoodExcellentFO33623
March 199883.0FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO33623
May 199672.0FairSatisfactoryFairFairFO33623
April 199474.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFairFO18700
April 199274.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFairFO18700
May 199074.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFairFO18700