Share:

RTE 907M over RTE 907M, WB GCP - NORTH

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.75746, -73.85216
40°45'27" N, 73°51'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE 907M over RTE 907M, WB GCP - NORTH
Structure number:000000001075670
Location:JCT GCP+I678
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:63.0 ft. [19.2 m]
Total length:250.0 ft. [76.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:43.0 ft. [13.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:53.5 ft. [16.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:24°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Year reconstructed:1990
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:60.8 tons [55.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:95.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$5,331,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
March 201695.0FairVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO-
March 201479.3FairVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO11584
March 201279.3FairVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO11584
August 201179.3FairVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO11584
March 201079.3FairVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO11584
May 200979.3FairVery GoodSatisfactoryGoodFO11584
February 200879.3FairVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO11584
February 200679.3FairVery GoodGoodSatisfactoryFO11584
January 200479.3FairVery GoodGoodSatisfactoryFO11584
January 200267.9FairVery GoodGoodSatisfactoryFO198019
January 200065.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO198019
January 199854.0FairGoodSatisfactoryFairFO198019
February 199638.0PoorVery GoodFairPoorSD198019
January 199438.0PoorVery GoodSatisfactoryPoorSD198019
January 199265.0FairVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO198019
January 199034.0PoorPoorPoorPoorSD198019