Share:

RTE I278 over WB LAUREL HILL BD

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.73848, -73.90370
40°44'19" N, 73°54'13" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I278 over WB LAUREL HILL BD
Structure number:000000001075910
Location:1.1 MI NE JCT I278 & I495
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:121.7 ft. [37.1 m]
Total length:554.8 ft. [169.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Skew angle:31°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1969
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:7
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:74.8 tons [68.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:38.9 tons [35.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:83.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$2,658,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
June 201583.0FairGoodGoodFairFO-
June 201483.0FairGoodGoodFairFO796
June 201383.0FairGoodGoodFairFO796
July 201196.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO796
July 200996.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO796
July 200796.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO796
June 200585.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFairFO796
April 200468.9PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoorSD796
May 200384.0FairGoodGoodFairFO796
June 200195.0FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO796
March 199993.0FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO796
June 199793.0FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO796
July 199561.6PoorFairFairPoorSD10400
July 199361.6PoorFairFairPoorSD10400
September 199161.6PoorFairFairPoorSD10400