Share:

RTE I678 over RTE 907M, RTE 907M, RTE

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.75736, -73.85239
40°45'27" N, 73°51'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:RTE I678 over RTE 907M, RTE 907M, RTE
Structure number:000000001075930
Location:JCT GCP+I678
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:176.8 ft. [53.9 m]
Total length:726.7 ft. [221.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:41.7 ft. [12.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:44.9 ft. [13.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Year reconstructed:1994
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:10
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Truck traffic:9% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:49.9 tons [45.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:29.9 tons [27.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:79.1
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$7,488,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
September 201679.1FairGoodFairFairFO-
November 201457.6FairVery GoodFairFairFO92583
November 201257.6FairVery GoodFairFairFO92583
December 201038.4PoorVery GoodSatisfactoryPoorSD92583
December 200957.6FairVery GoodSatisfactoryFairFO92583
December 200857.6FairVery GoodSatisfactoryFairFO92583
October 200669.8FairVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO92583
October 200468.8FairVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO92583
October 200269.8FairVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory-92583
October 200071.8FairVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory-92583
November 199873.2GoodVery GoodGoodGood-71469
December 199633.6PoorSatisfactoryPoorPoor-68857
December 199440.1PoorSatisfactoryPoorPoorSD68857
October 199237.0PoorVery GoodPoorPoorSD111874
October 199034.0PoorPoorPoorPoorSD111874