GCP EB TO 25AX EB over RTE 907M


+40.75826, -73.85449
40°45'30" N, 73°51'16" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:GCP EB TO 25AX EB over RTE 907M
Structure number:000000001075980
Location:JCT GCP+I678
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:85.0 ft. [25.9 m]
Total length:170.0 ft. [51.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:43.0 ft. [13.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:53.2 ft. [16.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:27°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Year reconstructed:1995
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:11,316 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:68.9 tons [62.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:40.9 tons [37.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:50.8
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$5,554,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
January 201650.8PoorGoodSatisfactoryPoorSD11316
January 201467.3FairVery GoodGoodFairFO9221
January 201277.7GoodVery GoodGoodGoodFO22000
January 201077.7GoodVery GoodGoodGoodFO22000
January 200877.7GoodVery GoodGoodGoodFO22000
January 200677.7GoodVery GoodVery GoodGoodFO22000
January 200478.7GoodVery GoodVery GoodGoodFO22000
February 200275.6GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO22000
January 200073.6FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO22000
January 199873.6FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO22000
February 199660.6FairSatisfactoryFairFairFO22000
January 199463.4FairVery GoodFairFairFO22000
January 199262.4FairVery GoodFairFairFO22000
January 199042.9PoorPoorFairPoorSD22000