RTE 25 over RTE 907M, GCP W TO NORTH


+40.75750, -73.85244
40°45'27" N, 73°51'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 25 over RTE 907M, GCP W TO NORTH
Structure number:000000001075990
Location:JCT GCP+I678
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:71.9 ft. [21.9 m]
Total length:295.9 ft. [90.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:24°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Year reconstructed:1994
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:72,763 [as of 2008]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:62.9 tons [57.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:37.0 tons [33.6 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:62.5
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$2,011,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
August 201662.5FairExcellentFairSatisfactoryFO72763
September 201455.8FairExcellentFairSatisfactoryFO72763
October 201255.8FairExcellentFairGoodFO72800
October 201069.2GoodExcellentGoodGoodFO54700
August 200869.2GoodExcellentGoodGoodFO54700
July 200669.2GoodExcellentGoodGoodFO54700
March 200469.2GoodExcellentGoodGoodFO54700
April 200269.2GoodExcellentGoodGood-54700
February 200069.2FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory-54700
March 199869.2FairVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory-54700
June 199658.8FairVery GoodFairSatisfactoryFO54700
April 199443.8PoorVery GoodPoorPoorSD54700
March 199417.0PoorPoorPoorSeriousSD54700
April 199217.0PoorPoorPoorSeriousSD54700
August 199117.0PoorPoorPoorSeriousSD54700