Share:

RTE 25 over RTE 907M, GCP W TO NORTH

Map

Coordinates:
+40.75752, -73.85241
40°45'27" N, 73°51'09" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RTE 25 over RTE 907M, GCP W TO NORTH
Structure number:000000001075990
Location:JCT GCP+I678
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:71.9 ft. [21.9 m]
Total length:295.9 ft. [90.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Skew angle:24°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Year reconstructed:1994
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:72,763 [as of 2008]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Sufficiency rating:62.5
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$2,011,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
August 2016FairExcellentFairSatisfactory7276362.5
September 2014FairExcellentFairSatisfactory7276355.8
October 2012FairExcellentFairGood7280055.8
October 2010GoodExcellentGoodGood5470069.2
August 2008GoodExcellentGoodGood5470069.2
July 2006GoodExcellentGoodGood5470069.2
March 2004GoodExcellentGoodGood5470069.2
April 2002GoodExcellentGoodGood5470069.2
February 2000FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory5470069.2
March 1998FairVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactory5470069.2
June 1996FairVery GoodFairSatisfactory5470058.8
April 1994PoorVery GoodPoorPoor5470043.8
March 1994PoorPoorPoorSerious5470017.0
April 1992PoorPoorPoorSerious5470017.0
August 1991PoorPoorPoorSerious5470017.0