RTE 907M over RTE 907A


+40.74426, -73.73339
40°44'39" N, 73°44'00" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RTE 907M over RTE 907A
Structure number:000000001076610
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:61.7 ft. [18.8 m]
Total length:66.9 ft. [20.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:45.6 ft. [13.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:53.5 ft. [16.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:10.8 ft. [3.3 m]
Skew angle:16°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1972
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:15,618 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:63.0 tons [57.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:25.0 tons [22.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:83.3
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$3,843,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
January 201683.3FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO15618
January 201488.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO10170
January 201288.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO10170
January 201088.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO10170
January 200888.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO10170
January 200688.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO10170
February 200488.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO10170
March 200288.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO10170
February 200087.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO10170
February 199887.4Fair-SatisfactorySatisfactoryFO10170
February 199675.4Fair-FairFairFO10170
February 199475.7Fair-FairFairFO10170
February 199275.7Fair-FairFairFO10170
March 199075.7Fair-FairFairFO10170