ROOSEVELT AVE over RTE 907X, IRT LOWER TRAC

Map

Coordinates:
+40.75275, -73.85190
40°45'10" N, 73°51'07" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	ROOSEVELT AVE over RTE 907X, IRT LOWER TRAC
Structure number:	000000001076767
Location:	.4 MI S GCP+I678
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:	Other Principal Arterial (Urban) `[14]`
Length of largest span:	39.7 ft. `[12.1 m]`
Total length:	81.0 ft. `[24.7 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	44.0 ft. `[13.4 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	74.2 ft. `[22.6 m]`
Vertical clearance above deck:	15.7 ft. `[4.8 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	9.8 ft. `[3.0 m]`
Skew angle:	6°
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1930
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Number of main spans:	2
Main spans material:	Steel `[3]`
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	15,906 `[as of 2016]`
Truck traffic:	11% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Underclearances appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. `[N]`
Sufficiency rating:	65.0
Recommended work:	Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. `[36]`
Estimated cost of work:	$868,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
April 2016	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	15906	65.0
April 2014	Good	Good	Good	Good	13085	72.5
April 2012	Good	Good	Good	Good	13100	72.5
May 2010	Good	Good	Good	Good	24192	70.3
May 2008	Good	Good	Good	Good	13233	72.5
May 2006	Good	Good	Good	Good	24192	70.3
January 2004	Good	Good	Good	Good	24192	70.3
January 2002	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Good	22514	46.1
January 2000	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	22514	54.6
January 1998	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	22514	54.6
February 1996	Poor	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Poor	22514	17.2
January 1994	Poor	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Poor	20000	17.4
February 1992	Poor	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Poor	20000	17.4
May 1990	Poor	Poor	Poor	Poor	20000	14.2