ROOSEVELT AVE over RTE 907X, IRT LOWER TRAC

Map

Coordinates:
+40.75275, -73.85191
40°45'10" N, 73°51'07" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Name:	ROOSEVELT AVE over RTE 907X, IRT LOWER TRAC
Structure number:	000000001076767
Location:	.4 MI S GCP+I678
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:	Other Principal Arterial (Urban) `[14]`
Length of largest span:	39.7 ft. `[12.1 m]`
Total length:	80.7 ft. `[24.6 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	44.0 ft. `[13.4 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	74.2 ft. `[22.6 m]`
Vertical clearance above deck:	15.7 ft. `[4.8 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	11.5 ft. `[3.5 m]`
Skew angle:	6°
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1930
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Number of main spans:	2
Main spans material:	Steel `[3]`
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	15,906 `[as of 2016]`
Truck traffic:	11% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Underclearances appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. `[N]`
Operating rating:	66.0 tons `[60.0 metric tons]`
Inventory rating:	27.5 tons `[25.0 metric tons]`
Sufficiency rating:	65.0
Recommended work:	Bridge deck rehabilitation with only incidental widening. `[36]`
Estimated cost of work:	$868,000

Date	Suff. Rating	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	SD/FO	ADT
April 2016	65.0	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	FO	15906
April 2014	72.5	Good	Good	Good	Good	FO	13085
April 2012	72.5	Good	Good	Good	Good	FO	13100
May 2010	70.3	Good	Good	Good	Good	FO	24192
May 2008	72.5	Good	Good	Good	Good	FO	13233
May 2006	70.3	Good	Good	Good	Good	FO	24192
January 2004	70.3	Good	Good	Good	Good	FO	24192
January 2002	46.1	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Good	FO	22514
January 2000	54.6	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	FO	22514
January 1998	54.6	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	FO	22514
February 1996	17.2	Poor	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Poor	SD	22514
January 1994	17.4	Poor	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Poor	SD	20000
February 1992	17.4	Poor	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Poor	SD	20000
May 1990	14.2	Poor	Poor	Poor	Poor	SD	20000