RTE 27 over RTE 27
Map
Coordinates:
+40.66744, -73.9957240°40'03" N, 73°59'45" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | RTE 27 over RTE 27 |
Structure number: | 000000001076849 |
Location: | JCT I278 & RTE 27 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11] |
Length of largest span: | 32.8 ft. [10.0 m] |
Total length: | 39.7 ft. [12.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 31.2 ft. [9.5 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 14.4 ft. [4.4 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1940 |
Year reconstructed: | 1997 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2015
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Inventory rating: | 75.8 tons [68.9 metric tons] |
Sufficiency rating: | 90.0 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $113,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Suff. Rating | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | SD/FO | ADT |
---|
August 2015 | 90.0 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | FO | - |
August 2013 | 77.0 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | FO | 45546 |
September 2011 | 77.0 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | FO | 45546 |
September 2009 | 77.0 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | FO | 45546 |
October 2007 | 77.0 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Very Good | FO | 45546 |
July 2005 | 77.0 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | - | 45546 |
July 2003 | 77.0 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | - | 45546 |
July 2001 | 77.0 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | - | 10000 |
July 1999 | 75.0 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | - | 10000 |
September 1997 | 75.0 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | - | 10000 |
May 1995 | 61.0 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | SD | 10000 |
August 1993 | 62.0 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | SD | 10000 |
February 1992 | 47.0 | Poor | Poor | Serious | Poor | SD | 10000 |
February 1991 | 47.0 | Poor | Poor | Serious | Poor | SD | 10000 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2016 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1. Good | 2. Fair | 3. Poor | 4. Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Stringer | linear ft. | 880 | 880 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 3,240 | 3,240 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 44 | 35 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 44 | 35 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 22 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 160 | 148 | 12 | 0 | 0 |