Share:

WOODHULL STREET over RTE I278

Map 

Coordinates:
+40.68186, -74.00581
40°40'55" N, 74°00'21" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:WOODHULL STREET over RTE I278
Structure number:000000001076910
Location:JCT I 278 & I 478
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Total length:31.8 ft. [9.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:95.1 ft. [29.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.8 ft. [4.2 m]
Skew angle:35°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1946
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:616 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:74.9 tons [68.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.3 tons [29.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:81.3
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$660,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
May 201681.3FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO616
April 201467.8FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO607
April 201248.8FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO9545
June 201148.8FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO9545
May 201048.8FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO9545
May 200948.8FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO9545
May 200848.8FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO9545
July 200648.8FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO9545
July 200548.8FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO9545
July 200448.8FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO9545
June 200348.8FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO9545
April 200248.6FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO9545
June 200148.6FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO9545
November 200033.8PoorSatisfactoryPoorFairSD9545
August 199948.6FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO9545
October 199849.0FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO5400
October 199733.5PoorFairPoorFairSD5400
November 199628.1PoorPoorPoorFairSD5400
November 199428.7PoorPoorPoorPoorSD5400
December 199228.7PoorPoorPoorPoorSD5400
November 199128.7PoorPoorPoorPoorSD5400