WOODHULL STREET over RTE I278

Map

Coordinates:
+40.68186, -74.00581
40°40'55" N, 74°00'21" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	WOODHULL STREET over RTE I278
Structure number:	000000001076910
Location:	JCT I 278 & I 478
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:	Local (Urban) `[19]`
Length of largest span:	27.9 ft. `[8.5 m]`
Total length:	31.8 ft. `[9.7 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	29.9 ft. `[9.1 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	95.1 ft. `[29.0 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	13.8 ft. `[4.2 m]`
Skew angle:	35°
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1946
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Main span material:	Steel `[3]`
Main span design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	616 `[as of 2013]`
Truck traffic:	4% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Underclearances appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. `[N]`
Operating rating:	74.9 tons `[68.1 metric tons]`
Inventory rating:	32.3 tons `[29.4 metric tons]`
Sufficiency rating:	81.3
Recommended work:	Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. `[34]`
Estimated cost of work:	$660,000

Date	Suff. Rating	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	SD/FO	ADT
May 2016	81.3	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	FO	616
April 2014	67.8	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	FO	607
April 2012	48.8	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	FO	9545
June 2011	48.8	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	FO	9545
May 2010	48.8	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	FO	9545
May 2009	48.8	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	FO	9545
May 2008	48.8	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	FO	9545
July 2006	48.8	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	FO	9545
July 2005	48.8	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	FO	9545
July 2004	48.8	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	FO	9545
June 2003	48.8	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	FO	9545
April 2002	48.6	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	FO	9545
June 2001	48.6	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	FO	9545
November 2000	33.8	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Fair	SD	9545
August 1999	48.6	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	FO	9545
October 1998	49.0	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	FO	5400
October 1997	33.5	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	SD	5400
November 1996	28.1	Poor	Poor	Poor	Fair	SD	5400
November 1994	28.7	Poor	Poor	Poor	Poor	SD	5400
December 1992	28.7	Poor	Poor	Poor	Poor	SD	5400
November 1991	28.7	Poor	Poor	Poor	Poor	SD	5400