WOODHULL STREET over RTE I278
Map
Coordinates:
+40.68186, -74.0058140°40'55" N, 74°00'21" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
Name: | WOODHULL STREET over RTE I278 |
Structure number: | 000000001076910 |
Location: | JCT I 278 & I 478 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway |
Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
Length of largest span: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Total length: | 31.8 ft. [9.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 95.1 ft. [29.0 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 13.8 ft. [4.2 m] |
Skew angle: | 35° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1946 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2016
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 616 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Operating rating: | 74.9 tons [68.1 metric tons] |
Inventory rating: | 32.3 tons [29.4 metric tons] |
Sufficiency rating: | 81.3 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $660,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Suff. Rating | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | SD/FO | ADT |
---|
May 2016 | 81.3 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 616 |
April 2014 | 67.8 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 607 |
April 2012 | 48.8 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 9545 |
June 2011 | 48.8 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 9545 |
May 2010 | 48.8 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 9545 |
May 2009 | 48.8 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 9545 |
May 2008 | 48.8 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 9545 |
July 2006 | 48.8 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 9545 |
July 2005 | 48.8 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 9545 |
July 2004 | 48.8 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 9545 |
June 2003 | 48.8 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 9545 |
April 2002 | 48.6 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 9545 |
June 2001 | 48.6 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 9545 |
November 2000 | 33.8 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | SD | 9545 |
August 1999 | 48.6 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 9545 |
October 1998 | 49.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | FO | 5400 |
October 1997 | 33.5 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | SD | 5400 |
November 1996 | 28.1 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | SD | 5400 |
November 1994 | 28.7 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | SD | 5400 |
December 1992 | 28.7 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | SD | 5400 |
November 1991 | 28.7 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | SD | 5400 |