Share:

Bruckner Blvd. NB over RTE I695, RTE I695

Map

Coordinates:
+40.83594, -73.82439
40°50'09" N, 73°49'28" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:Bruckner Blvd. NB over RTE I695, RTE I695
Structure number:000000001078950
Location:JCT I295 + I95
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:101.4 ft. [30.9 m]
Total length:188.0 ft. [57.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:35.8 ft. [10.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Skew angle:47°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2006
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:17,874 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Sufficiency rating:93.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$5,156,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
February 2016GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good1787493.0
February 2014GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good1787495.0
February 2012GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent1790095.0