RTE 9 over HUDSON RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+42.64270, -73.74646
42°38'34" N, 73°44'47" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	RTE 9 over HUDSON RIVER
Structure number:	000000001093029
Location:	DOWNTOWN ALBANY
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:	Other Principal Arterial (Urban) `[14]`
Length of largest span:	350.1 ft. `[106.7 m]`
Total length:	985.0 ft. `[300.2 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	104.0 ft. `[31.7 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	120.4 ft. `[36.7 m]`
Vertical clearance above deck:	17.1 ft. `[5.2 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	59.1 ft. `[18.0 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1969
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod `[6]`
Number of main spans:	6
Main spans material:	Steel continuous `[4]`
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Latex Concrete or similar additive `[3]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	33,755 `[as of 2007]`
Truck traffic:	6% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. `[7]`
Pier/abutment protection:	In place and functioning `[2]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	73.3
Recommended work:	Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. `[34]`
Estimated cost of work:	$44,010,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
December 2017	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	33755	73.3
October 2015	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	34977	55.0
November 2013	Fair	Good	Good	Fair	34977	55.0
November 2011	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Fair	35000	55.0
November 2010	Fair	Good	Good	Fair	18815	59.1
October 2009	Fair	Good	Good	Fair	34977	55.0
December 2008	Fair	Good	Good	Fair	34977	55.0
November 2007	Fair	Good	Good	Fair	34977	55.0
December 2006	Fair	Good	Good	Fair	18815	59.1
October 2005	Fair	Good	Good	Fair	18815	59.1
October 2003	Fair	Good	Good	Fair	18815	46.9
October 2001	Fair	Good	Good	Fair	18815	46.7
September 1999	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	32419	55.0
December 1997	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Fair	34913	55.0
October 1995	Poor	Fair	Poor	Poor	34913	27.9
December 1993	Poor	Poor	Poor	Poor	34913	25.9
December 1991	Poor	Poor	Fair	Poor	27297	49.6

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beam	linear ft.	3	0	0	2	1
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap	linear ft.	18	0	0	18	0
Bearings
Movable Bearing	each	15	6	2	7	0