Share:

HAMILTON PLACE over RTE I495, RTE I495

Map

Coordinates:
+40.72591, -73.89962
40°43'33" N, 73°53'59" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:HAMILTON PLACE over RTE I495, RTE I495
Structure number:000000002065930
Location:1.4 MI SE JCT I278 & I495
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:89.9 ft. [27.4 m]
Total length:166.0 ft. [50.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:67.9 ft. [20.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Skew angle:40°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1955
Year reconstructed:1991
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,250 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Sufficiency rating:75.6
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$6,254,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
February 2016GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good625075.6
February 2014GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good940376.0
March 2012GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good940376.0
March 2010GoodGoodExcellentVery Good867876.0
March 2008GoodVery GoodExcellentVery Good985676.0
April 2006GoodVery GoodExcellentGood940376.0
June 2004GoodExcellentExcellentGood940376.0
July 2002GoodVery GoodExcellentGood821376.0
May 2000GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood821383.0
June 1998GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood821383.0
June 1996FairVery GoodVery GoodFair1663872.0
April 1994FairVery GoodVery GoodFair700064.5
July 1992FairVery GoodVery GoodFair700065.5
October 1990GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good700072.5