69TH STREET over RTE I495, RTE I495


+40.72517, -73.89482
40°43'31" N, 73°53'41" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:69TH STREET over RTE I495, RTE I495
Structure number:000000002065950
Location:1.7 MI SE JCT I278+I495
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:82.7 ft. [25.2 m]
Total length:151.9 ft. [46.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:67.9 ft. [20.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:36°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1955
Year reconstructed:1988
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:85.8 tons [78.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:51.9 tons [47.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:80.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$6,173,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
June 201580.0FairSatisfactoryGoodFairFO-
July 201374.8FairSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactoryFO19019
July 201174.7FairGoodVery GoodSatisfactoryFO19900
May 200974.7FairVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactoryFO19910
May 200774.6FairVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactoryFO21249
May 200573.8FairVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactoryFO19019
May 200373.8FairVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactoryFO19019
June 200174.8GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO19217
June 199974.8GoodVery GoodVery GoodGoodFO19217
November 199774.8FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO19217
September 199564.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair-19000
September 199348.4PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor-19000
November 199165.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair-19000