RTE 495 over 74TH STREET


+40.72763, -73.88724
40°43'39" N, 73°53'14" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:RTE 495 over 74TH STREET
Structure number:000000002065973
Location:2.1 MI ESE JCT I278 &I495
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:108.9 ft. [33.2 m]
Total length:110.9 ft. [33.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.2 ft. [8.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:38°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1988
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:158,270 [as of 2005]
Truck traffic:13% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:83.8 tons [76.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:49.9 tons [45.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:88.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$130,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
May 201588.2FairVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactoryFO158270
May 201392.1GoodVery GoodVery GoodGoodFO79135
June 201195.8GoodVery GoodVery GoodExcellentFO3403
June 200992.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodExcellentFO81495
June 200792.1GoodVery GoodExcellentExcellentFO79135
June 200595.8GoodVery GoodExcellentGoodFO3403
May 200391.8GoodVery GoodExcellentExcellentFO3403
April 200191.8GoodExcellentExcellentVery GoodFO3403
January 199991.8FairExcellentSatisfactoryGoodFO3403
April 199791.2GoodExcellentVery GoodExcellentFO16427
May 199590.6GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-16427
May 199386.6GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-65000
March 199186.6GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-65000