WHITES STORE RD over TRIB WHITES STORE
Map
Coordinates:
+42.48378, -75.4092442°29'02" N, 75°24'33" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | WHITES STORE RD over TRIB WHITES STORE |
Structure number: | 000000002226350 |
Location: | 0.6 MI SW OF WHITE STORE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
Total length: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 26.6 ft. [8.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
Year built: | 1870 |
Year reconstructed: | 1968 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Masonry [8] |
Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 66 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 79.7 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $227,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2018 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 66 | 79.7 |
May 2017 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 67 | 79.7 |
May 2016 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 75 | 79.7 |
May 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 75 | 75.0 |
May 2014 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 75 | 75.0 |
May 2013 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 75 | 86.0 |
May 2012 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 80 | 86.0 |
May 2011 | Fair | - | Fair | Satisfactory | 80 | 75.0 |
June 2010 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 89 | 86.0 |
May 2009 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 89 | 59.0 |
July 2008 | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Poor | 75 | 63.6 |
August 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 75 | 89.6 |
May 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 89 | 89.6 |
October 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 89 | 90.6 |
October 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 89 | 90.6 |
August 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 89 | 85.1 |
July 1996 | Poor | - | Poor | Fair | 89 | 58.9 |
June 1994 | Poor | - | Poor | Fair | 50 | 57.9 |
May 1992 | Poor | - | Poor | Fair | 50 | 52.9 |
May 1990 | Poor | - | Poor | Fair | 50 | 48.6 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Arch | linear ft. | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 363 | 0 | 363 | 0 | 0 |
Masonry Arch | linear ft. | 21 | 0 | 11 | 10 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 22 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Masonry Abutment | linear ft. | 39 | 0 | 39 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 61 | 0 | 61 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 42 | 0 | 40 | 2 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 96 | 0 | 72 | 0 | 24 |